Over the past few weeks we’ve been exploring how technology has shaped exercise over time.
​
We started about 150 years ago with some of the earliest tools that changed how people moved — bicycles, spring resistance machines, and some fascinating home exercise inventions.
​
Then we moved into the era when music made movement personal. Walkmans, Discmen, iPods, and eventually the playlists many of us carry on our phones today.
​
Last week I shared a story from my synchronized swimming days, when a new piece of training technology changed how we practiced and stayed connected to the rhythm of the routine.
​
Each of those moments reflected a shift in how technology interacted with movement.
​
But in the past 15–20 years, something different has happened.
​
Technology stopped just surrounding our movement.
​
It started measuring it.
 ✔ Step counters.
 ✔ Heart rate monitors.
 ✔ Sleep tracking.
 ✔ GPS watches

Suddenly movement wasn’t just something we experienced.
​
It was something we could track.
​
Devices like Fitbit and the Apple Watch made it possible to see how many steps we take in a day, how our heart rate responds to exercise, and even how well we sleep at night.
​
For many people, this information has been incredibly motivating.
​
It can bring awareness to patterns we might not otherwise notice.
​
But here’s something I see often from a movement perspective.
​
More information doesn’t always mean more clarity.
​
Sometimes people end up with lots of data but aren’t quite sure what to do with it.
​
Your watch might tell you your heart rate.
Your phone might tell you your step count.
​
But neither one can fully answer a very personal question:
​

Your body has always been giving you information.
​
Technology has simply given us new ways to notice it.
​
And that’s where this story of exercise technology gets even more interesting.
​
For most of human history, technology helped us move.
​
Now it’s starting to help us understand how we move.
​
More on that next week. 
​
---
​
Before we get there, I’m curious about one more thing.
​
 Have you ever used a fitness tracker or wearable device?
A Fitbit?
An Apple Watch?
A GPS running watch?
​
Did you find the data helpful, motivating, confusing… or a bit of all three?
​
If a thought comes to mind, comment below and let me know. I always enjoy hearing your perspectives.
​
Stay well and happy moving,
Lisa

Over the past couple of weeks we’ve been exploring how technology has shaped exercise over time.
​
​First we looked at early equipment — bicycles, spring resistance machines, and some fascinating home fitness inventions.
​
​Last week we talked about when exercise became more personal, especially when music became portable through things like the Walkman, Discman, and eventually the phones we carry today.
​
But today I want to share a story from much earlier in my life.
​
From my synchronized swimming days.
​
At the time, I thought we had the most high-tech training setup imaginable.
​
And honestly, it felt like the future.
​
Synchronized swimming requires athletes to move in perfect timing with both the music and each other.
​
But here’s the challenge.
​
Much of the routine happens underwater.

Which means for years, swimmers often had to rely on counting in their heads and watching their teammates carefully to stay synchronized with the music.
​
Then a new piece of training technology arrived at our pool.
​
Underwater speakers.
​
For the first time, we could hear the music clearly while we were underwater.
​
It changed everything about how we practiced.
​
We could feel the rhythm more easily.
We could match the timing of the choreography more precisely.
And we could stay connected to the music throughout the entire routine.
​
Looking back now, it might not seem like a huge technological breakthrough.
​
But at the time, it completely transformed the training experience.
​
From a movement perspective, rhythm and timing play a much bigger role than we often realize.
Your nervous system responds to rhythm.
Your muscles coordinate around timing.
And when people move together — whether in a sport, a fitness class, or even a group walk — rhythm helps create connection.
​
Technology didn’t replace the skill.
​
But it gave us better information while we were training.
​
And that’s something we see again and again in the evolution of exercise.
​
Technology rarely replaces the body.
​
But it can help us notice things we couldn’t see, hear, or feel before.
​
 So I’m curious again this week.
​
What’s a piece of training technology that changed how you practiced a sport or activity?
Maybe it was music.
Maybe it was a heart-rate monitor.
Maybe it was the first time you followed an exercise video at home.
​
If a memory comes to mind, comment below and tell me. I always enjoy hearing these stories.
​
Next week we’ll jump forward again — into the era of wearable trackers, exercise apps, and the explosion of data that many of us now carry on our wrists.
​
Technology has moved from machines around us…
​
to information about us.
​
And that shift has changed exercise in ways we’re still figuring out.
​
Stay well and happy moving,
Lisa

Before we jump into today’s topic, I want to say thank you to those of you who replied to last week’s post.​
​
I asked about the first piece of exercise technology you remember… and your responses were fantastic.
​
There was such a variety of memories.
​
Some of you mentioned the Total Gym, others remembered Weider gold plates for barbells at home.
​
And a few of you introduced me to equipment I had never even heard of before.
​
One that stood out was the Slim Gym from the 1970s.

​I have to admit — that was a new one for me.
​
What I loved most about the replies wasn’t just the equipment itself. It was the stories attached to them.
​
Because technology doesn’t just shape how we exercise.
​
It shapes the memories we build around movement.
​
So if something comes to mind as you read today’s email — an old piece of equipment, something tucked away in a basement gym, or a workout tool from years ago — feel free to hit reply and share it with me. I genuinely enjoy hearing these stories.

​
​Last week we looked at some of the earliest examples of exercise technology.
Bicycles.
Spring resistance machines.
Even those vibration belts that promised to “shake” you into fitness.
​
Technology has always been part of how we move.
​
But somewhere along the way, something shifted.
​
Exercise became… personal.
​
And music played a big role in that shift.
​
So let’s slow this down for a moment.
​
Before the 1980s, music in exercise mostly came from the room you were in. Maybe there was a stereo in the gym. Maybe a cassette playing during a fitness class. But everyone heard the same thing.
​
Then came the portable radio and the Walkman.

​Suddenly people could take music with them. On a walk. On a run. On a bike ride.
​
Movement became portable.
​
And something interesting happened.
​
People started moving longer.
​
From a movement perspective, music changes how the nervous system experiences effort. It can reduce the perception of fatigue, influence rhythm, and create a sense of momentum.​
​
It’s not just background noise.
​
It becomes part of the experience of movement.
​
The technology kept evolving.
​
The Discman arrived in the 1990s (along with the challenge of trying to run without the CD skipping).
​
Then came the iPod in the early 2000s. Thousands of songs in your pocket.
​
And now?
Most of us carry our entire music library on our phones. Wireless earbuds. Noise-cancelling headphones. Playlists designed specifically for workouts.
​
The technology keeps getting smaller.
​
But the effect is still the same.
​
It changes how movement feels.
​
And yet, something interesting hasn’t changed.
​
Your body still responds to rhythm.
Your nervous system still responds to pacing.
And movement still works best when it meets you where you are.
​
Technology may change the interface.
​
But the body still speaks the same language.
​
 So I’m curious again this week.
​
What was the first way you listened to music while exercising?
A Walkman clipped to your waistband?
A Discman bouncing in a backpack?
An iPod shuffle?
Or maybe a playlist on your phone today?
​
Drop a comment below and tell me. I always enjoy hearing your stories.
​
Next week I’m going to share a story from my synchronized swimming days — when I thought we had the most high-tech training setup imaginable.
​
And at the time, it felt like the future.
​
Be well and happy moving,
Lisa

So let’s start here…
​
Long before Fitbits.
Long before Peloton screens.
Long before step counts and heart rate zones.
​
Technology was already shaping how we moved.
​
About 150 years ago, one of the most revolutionary pieces of movement technology was… a bicycle.
​
In the late 1800s, the “safety bicycle” changed everything. It wasn’t just transportation. It was independence. Especially for women. For many, it was the first time their bodies could move freely beyond walking distance.
​
And yet — not everyone rode.

​My grandmother was introduced to the bicycle in her lifetime. It was new. It was modern. It was a big shift.
​
She never learned to ride.
​
And that’s important.
​
Because technology doesn’t automatically change behaviour. It only creates possibility.
​
In the early 1900s, pulley systems and spring resistance machines began appearing in gymnasiums.
​
After World War I, Joseph Pilates refined spring-based equipment while working with injured soldiers — using resistance to restore function. Springs allowed people to load the body in a controlled way. It was structured. Intentional.
​
Later came vibration belt machines — the kind that wrapped around your hips and “shook” you into fitness. There was a belief that technology could do the work for you. I can't tell you how many people have told me their grandparent or parent used a vibration belt machine!

Here’s what I see all the time…
​
Every generation believes their version of exercise technology is revolutionary.
​
And in some ways, it is.
​
But what’s important to understand here is this:
Technology doesn’t replace awareness.
​
It doesn’t replace dosage.
​
And it doesn’t replace the relationship you have with your body.
​
From a movement perspective, technology has always been a tool.
​
A dial — not a switch.
It can turn intensity up.
It can make movement more accessible.
It can make it more engaging.
But it cannot decide for you what your body needs today.
​
So I’m curious…
What was the first piece of “exercise technology” you remember?
Was it a bicycle?
A home gym machine in the basement?
One of those shaking belts?
A VHS tape?
​

Comment below and tell me. I’d genuinely love to hear your story.
​
Next week, we’ll move into the era when music changed everything.
​
Because once exercise became portable…
It became personal.
​
And that changed the game entirely.
​
Stay well and happy moving,
Lisa